OUR STORY

Built for the lawyers Harvey forgot

99.5% of Canadian law firms have fewer than 100 lawyers. Harvey AI costs $225/user/month and is built for Am Law 100. We built Juris for everyone else.

What we saw

Zhang v. Chen changed everything

When the 2024 BCSC decision landed, it sent a chill through Canadian practice. A lawyer had filed AI-hallucinated citations and faced sanctions. It was not the last case. The risk was real, and every lawyer who used AI felt it.

💸

Enterprise tools don't fit

Harvey, CoCounsel, and Lexis+ AI were built for BigLaw. Their pricing ($225+/user/month), their onboarding, their support model — none of it fits a 2-person immigration boutique or a solo practitioner in Calgary.

📁

The status quo is broken

Clio takes $150+/user/month and ships no meaningful AI. ChatGPT has no CanLII access, no privilege protection, no verification workflow. Lawyers were trapped between expensive compliance and dangerous convenience.

99.5%

of Canadian law firms have fewer than 100 lawyers

Source: Law Society data

53.7%

of lawyers use generative AI — but only 22.1% trust it

Source: Thomson Reuters 2024 State of the Legal Market

$225+

per user per month at Harvey AI — before enterprise minimums

Source: Harvey AI published pricing

What we built — and why

Every design decision in Juris has a specific reason. Here are the ones that matter.

Schema-per-tenant isolation

Legal data is uniquely sensitive. A shared database means a software bug could expose one firm's client files to another. We eliminated that possibility architecturally — not just in policy.

Privilege exclusion at the data layer

Prompt-level instructions ("don't use privileged documents") can fail. Database-level exclusion cannot. Flagged documents are filtered in the SQL query before any AI sees them.

Mandatory citation verification

After Zhang v. Chen, we decided that optional verification was not enough. Sage cannot present a citation it has not checked against CanLII. This is not a feature — it is a constraint we chose.

EU hosting

US-hosted infrastructure is subject to CLOUD Act subpoenas. A US court can compel disclosure of client files without notifying you or your client. EU hosting removes that risk. Stronger protection, same price.

Flat firm-rate pricing

Per-user pricing punishes firms for growing. It creates a disincentive to add lawyers who need the tool. One flat rate means you add the articling student without a conversation about the billing impact.

Who we are

Juris is operated by Kwata Team Inc., a federally incorporated Canadian company registered in Alberta. We build software for Canadian professionals who need tools built with Canadian law, Canadian data residency expectations, and Canadian professional obligations in mind.

We are a small team. We are not a VC-funded startup racing to enterprise. We are building the tool we would want if we practised law.

Kwata Team Inc. · CBCA federally incorporated · Registered in Alberta

EU-hosted infrastructure · GDPR-jurisdictional · Not subject to US CLOUD Act

PIPEDA + Alberta PIPA compliant · 7-year audit retention for legal data

Start your free trial

14 days free. No credit card. No enterprise sales call.

Start free trial →